Intelligence with a dash of hierarchy

So, we’re on for the natural thing of mind. Who fits. Who adjust. Ranging. Is that what intelligence and hierarchy is all about? Noes. Most definitively not.

I do believe it has to be created by various levels of fragmentation for understand this whole thing. We are all said that every single one of us is born as an equal. And no, they did not give us any  kind of scientific reasons being unequal sufferings we are experiencing through, well, this thing called mankind. We do suffer due to fragmentation of their (rather losing) intelligence, which, of course, varies from one person to another. From that point standing, all our activities has its origin from their little state of a so called fragmented intelligence. If you throw in some acquired, or even perceived knowledge, dashed in with a bit of actualization with an object of desires which shall be motivated, through or due fragmentation. This ain’t rocket science either. Nothing is. You just put it together, and from that, something should be logical after all.

We are all human beings living along happily knowing we can decide and do what we want to to. Well, most of us can, really. But since we all are able to do these simple things, something bad will and shall happen. We create an unnatural and then it goes on to be an undesireable hierarchy of our intelligence. These things, will make conflicts, restlessness all over the place. Confusions are made to the top.

It is being said that human beings are being at the pinnacle of the lovely thing called evolutionary pyramid, because, we, of course, have a complex brain to flex around with. Okay, some say that this complex brain of ours, don’t only make us more intelligent, but kind of categories ourself from other organisms. We’ve been tested through both neurobiology and the way to go with anatomy. They’ve begun to chisel away that we, don’t actually, are smarter (go the way that our intelligence being associated with these kinds of things) than other beings, short said. It rather indicades that intelligence is on some kind of a continuum from the animals who should have a lower set of intelligence, to the animals which should have a higher set of it. Intelligence and evolution. So researches have actually showed that researchers in linguistics and biology have gone too many steps backward than forward from time to time. It is complex, and complex is always sweet. It gives you some challenge to work with, and everyone loves a good challenge.

So, is it really possible to build a hierarchy of cognitive abilities? Are we able to say that some animals are smarter than the other, by rearanging them in groups and saying the ant is dumber than the dove? Are there any clear blue definitions out there? Okay, of course the ant is smarter than any other being in his habitat. The cat wouldn’t be able to live the ant way of life, because the cat simply don’t know the way of the life of an ant. We can go on and forth with the biological intelligence of the animal. Back to the short words – in his world, every animal is the most intelligent being. Then we can move forward through eugenics (noes, not the holocaust way to go). If you have bad genes, we don’t need you. Keep your genes of hereditary clean, and all of us will be happy poochies. First come, first serve. By doing eugenics, like they do back with the other living beings back in the nature, they keep the healthiest, strongest, fittest, and most of all, the most intelligent one in their group of orgie matings. By doing that, they save resources and overpopulation.

But in your right mind, you will figure out that some animals _are_ smarter than others. We do, in fact, have some dumb animals around there too. It is true that the maggots are dumber than some fishes, and the fish is dumber than the dog, being dumber than the chimpanzee. Range them that way. None of these are more intelligent than Homo Sapiens. Or is this just something we’d call a result of anthropocentrism (the human kind being on top and centered of any other aspect of realitiesness). Or are we so self-centered we do believe in such things?

Our world ain’t no black and white. It does, in fact, contain plenty of colours in it (look away if you wear pink sunglasses!). Hierarchy in it self is ranged (oh, that’s the word again!) to be a kind of collectives. Through objects, people, grades and values. At all. It is all graduated and decided through yourself. Above and below the ladder of ranging. That being said, OED (Oxford English Dictionary) firstly ranged hierarchy as a reference to three orders by Dionysius the Pseudo-Areopagite (yeah, the priest and philosopher, read it up, kiddo). That being said, hierarchy is a result of religion in this matter. It sure derives from our Greek friends, called hierarchia, which ranges from hierarches, which litterally means the president of sacred rites. Hieros, which is sacred, arkho, which means to lead. I’m sure hierarchy ring a bell when you think about someone or something above, perhaps below. But are you sure it is at the same level as one? Opposed anarchy!

Not going there, we are in for the things living in the ecological chain of life. Abundance of life. Interactions between organisms and their environment. Just to jump back and forward to confuse you a bit.

Like play and fraud. We all do it. It’s a new step in how to organize the lifely world, being a unreal activity. We cannot only categorize the world around us, but you can see your own activity as an object for categorizing and reflection. The outside world is not only being directly thrown at you, some action significances impaired, but your own actions will also be impaired to top it up. So, of course you can make an action, without a meaning for what it might have been if you bought flowers to your mother on her birthday. You can do, but not exactly do it as well. This kind of fraudulensnessess is very important for a complex social interaction among other. A kind of symbolic behaviour and thinking, to internationalization by thinking, and the consciousness about mental conditions.

Play is, in fact, a kind of an activity we do, but the activity cannot come with a conclusion. It’s a kind of an ordinary life activity or parts of this, really. This activity should not bring something up with thoughts in the back of your brain. The game is pointless. If it does get points or gets rationalized, a kind of a known function or meaning in life, it gets serious, and there is no game as an activity anymore. Isolated.

But play does play (yeah!) a big part in how to establish social relations and social intelligence. Social play makes you learn how to know one and another, and learn yourself and other how to get to know themselves. You get a preview how the outside world actually works in its social life. That symbolic behaviour explained above, is a wee bit gone from the part of playing. You are able to accomplish the given activity. Mating, you say? Le femme et homme.

There is most certinatly a wonderful dash of hierarchy of intelligence out there. Beware. We are on intelligence.

I’ve left the building. For now.